Share on Pinterest Vaginismus may make inserting tampons difficult. When either or both of these things occur, the partners should be able to separate.ĭue to the lack of medical documentation, it may be safe to assume that penis captivus - when it does occur - is a temporary phenomenon that may only cause fleeting discomfort. The blood will eventually flow away from the penis, and it will become smaller and softer. The time that it takes for this to happen varies. However, after these vaginal contractions come to an end, the vaginal walls will relax. This could make it difficult for the partners to separate. In some rare cases, the vagina may contract with enough force to latch onto the penis. These contractions can be very strong, and they are sometimes stronger than usual. The vaginal walls are made up of muscular tissue, which expands and contracts at different times during sex, such as during an orgasm. For females, the walls of the vagina relax and the vulva lubricates in preparation for sexual penetration. It is important to note that this is anecdotal evidence, which holds less credibility than a case report, for example.ĭuring arousal, the penis fills with blood, becoming erect in preparation for sexual intercourse. He tells of a young couple affected by the condition arriving at the hospital by ambulance in 1947. In 1980, a doctor responded to the 1979 review and wrote to the BMJ to confirm the existence of penis captivus.
The lack of medical documentation may stem from the temporary nature of the phenomenon if penis captivus was routinely severe enough to require medical attention, it would likely have inspired more reporting. That said, these reports are extremely rare. The author concludes that although penis captivus may seem to be a myth, doctors have reported it.
The author of the review highlighted the scant references to the condition in medical literature, with the most thorough accounts of penis captivus published in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Reported cases are few and far between, and well-documented cases are even more rare.Ī review that appeared in the BMJ in 1979 notes that the existence of the condition was more established by hearsay than fact. There have been so few credible reports of penis captivus that some people, including some doctors, question its existence. Share on Pinterest Clinical reports of penis captivus are so rare that many doctors question its existence.